vs
Techstars vs Alchemist Accelerator
Founders often weigh Techstars against Alchemist Accelerator. Here's how the two compare on money, terms, format and selectivity — and how to decide.
Side by side
| Techstars | Alchemist Accelerator | |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $220K | $200K |
| Equity | 6% | — |
| Instrument | SAFE | Equity |
| Program length | 3 months | 6 months |
| Location | Global | San Francisco |
| Remote | No | No |
| International founders | Accepted | Accepted |
| Stages | Pre-seed, Seed | Seed |
| Applications | Check website | Multiple per year |
| Cohort size | ~10 | ~15 |
| Acceptance rate | ~1% | ~2% |
| Questions on the form | 26 | 33 |
Terms change between batches — confirm on each program's official site before applying.
Key differences
- Techstars writes the bigger cheque: up to $220K, against $200K from Alchemist Accelerator.
- Techstars is based in Global; Alchemist Accelerator in San Francisco.
- Techstars is more selective (about 1% accepted vs 2%).
- Alchemist Accelerator is the longer program (6 months vs 3).
Choose Techstars if…
$220K investment. 50+ programs worldwide.
Global accelerator network with 50+ programs across industries and cities. Strong mentor-driven model. Each program has a different focus (fintech, AI, health, etc.). Pick the one that matches your startup.
How to apply to Techstars →Choose Alchemist Accelerator if…
$200K+. Enterprise/B2B only. Strong corporate intros.
The best accelerator for B2B/enterprise startups. 6-month program focused on sales and customer acquisition. Strong connections to corporate development teams for pilot deals.
How to apply to Alchemist Accelerator →FAQ
Is Techstars better than Alchemist Accelerator?
Neither is better for everyone. Techstars writes the bigger cheque: up to $220K, against $200K from Alchemist Accelerator. Techstars is based in Global; Alchemist Accelerator in San Francisco. Choose by stage, sector, location and the terms you can accept — or apply to both.
Can I apply to both Techstars and Alchemist Accelerator?
Yes. Applying to several programs is normal, and many founders run applications in parallel. Most of the material — one-liner, traction, team, market — carries over between forms.
Which is harder to get into, Techstars or Alchemist Accelerator?
Both are selective. Estimates put Techstars at about 1% and Alchemist Accelerator at about 2% of applicants accepted. Neither publishes exact figures.
Why choose? Draft both applications from one profile.
Start freeMore comparisons
- Y Combinator (YC) vs Techstars
- Y Combinator (YC) vs a16z Speedrun
- Y Combinator (YC) vs 500 Global
- Y Combinator (YC) vs PearX (Pear VC)
- Y Combinator (YC) vs Sequoia Arc
- Y Combinator (YC) vs Entrepreneurs First (EF)
- Y Combinator (YC) vs South Park Commons
- a16z Speedrun vs PearX (Pear VC)
- a16z Speedrun vs a16z START
- Techstars vs 500 Global
- Techstars vs Plug and Play
- Entrepreneurs First (EF) vs Antler
- Seedcamp vs Entrepreneurs First (EF)
- South Park Commons vs On Deck Founders (ODF)